Driveways
Lots and larger areas
Surface damage
Structural
Is it worth repairing
Crack work and materials
Timing and cost
Who we work for
Planning and budget
Accessible stalls
This is the one part of a lot layout that is not a judgement call. The stall, the aisle beside it, the signage and the route to the entrance all have dimensions, and getting them wrong is the marking error that costs more than paint.
Four parts, not one
People think of it as a wider stall. It is four things: the stall itself, the hatched access aisle beside it that lets a door or a ramp open fully, signage at a set height, and a route from the stall to the entrance that does not require crossing behind parked vehicles.
The access aisle is the part most often lost. It gets narrowed to fit another space, or it ends up shared in a way the requirement does not allow, and the stall is then useless to the person it was painted for.
The route matters just as much and is the easiest to overlook, because it involves kerbs, ramps and drainage rather than paint. Water collecting on that route is a real problem, not a cosmetic one. The numbers themselves vary by jurisdiction and by lot size, so they are checked rather than carried over from the previous layout.
How it is set out
The number of accessible spaces usually scales with total stall count, and the requirement varies by jurisdiction rather than being a single national figure.
Position is part of the requirement. Spaces go nearest the accessible entrance, not in whatever corner was left over when the rest of the lot was laid out.
The hatched aisle is set out at the same time as the stall, because it is not a decorative margin and cannot be narrowed to recover a space.
Signs are mounted so they remain visible with a vehicle parked in the space, which is the reason a height is specified at all.
Common failures
The commonest is a stall that meets the width but has no access aisle, usually because a previous repaint recovered a space by taking it. From a distance the lot looks compliant and the space does not work.
The second is signage that is present but too low, obscured by a parked vehicle or faded past legibility. Paint on the ground alone does not meet most requirements.
The third is the route. A space correctly marked beside a kerb with no ramp, or a path that ponds after rain, fails the person using it regardless of how the lines look. Hardware and drainage are part of this, which is why it is checked on commercial sites as a whole rather than as a paint job.
Related work
Rarely a paint job on its own.
The rest of the layout, set out at the same time so the accessible spaces are not fitted around whatever was left.
Learn moreThe post-mounted signs that most requirements call for, fitted while the lot is already closed.
Learn moreWater collecting on the route between a stall and the entrance is a functional failure, not a cosmetic one.
Learn moreWhere accessible spaces were lost in a previous repaint, this is where they are put back.
Learn moreCommon questions
Accessible stalls laid out to the current code with the access aisle and the signage. The inspector had no notes.
They knew the stall width and aisle rules without being told. Saved us a re-stripe.
The accessible stalls were placed nearest the entrance on the flattest part of the lot, which is what the standard asks for.
Signage posts and painted symbols done in one visit. Compliant and tidy.
From the blog
Next step
We will count what you have, measure the stalls and aisles, look at the route to the door, and tell you where the lot falls short before anything is repainted.
Requirements vary by jurisdiction and are checked for your location.